ITC SUSTAINABILITY REPORT 2016 GRI - G4 COMPLIANT, IN ACCORDANCE - COMPREHENSIVE

  • Stakeholder Engagement

    In line with the Company's Board approved policy on stakeholder engagement, ITC has a structured framework to engage with stakeholders and address their key concerns. The framework is based upon established long term relationships with key stakeholders such as shareholders, farmers, customers, suppliers, employees, local communities, regulatory bodies and the media. With the firm belief that stakeholder engagement is an integral part of enriching and enduring partnerships, ITC has institutionalised these processes grounded on transparency and accountability.

    ITC's Process of Stakeholder Engagement

    Prioritisation and Addressal of Key Concerns

    The sensitivity of an issue to a stakeholder and to ITC, in terms of high/ medium/ low importance forms the basis of the materiality analysis which in turn leads to identification of material aspects, definition of management approach and specific action plans for addressal.

    Please refer to the Materiality Analysis section for further details on ITC's response to key stakeholders' concerns.

    Insights into Local Community Needs

    Since ITC's holistic development approach demands an intensive and deep level of engagement, it was necessary to identify and delineate core areas of in the catchments of our agri-businesses and factories. Based on parameters relevant to businesses and development indicators, current project areas were divided into core and non-core villages and clusters. Based on above filters, a total of 103 core clusters were demarcated comprising 902 villages/wards in 35 districts, which would form the nucleus of social investments in the coming five years.

    The most powerful dynamic driving ITC's Social Investment Programme is the fact that each one is anchored in direct community participation and rooted in choices made and shaped by them. The identification and demarcation of core project areas was therefore followed by an exhaustive stakeholder engagement process to elicit their felt needs and aspirations to gauge the extent to which the current set of interventions were valued by the communities and evaluate if any course correction was required.

    A total of 483 Participatory Rural Appraisals (PRA) were conducted covering more than half of the total core villages/habitations. Since PRAs are public meetings where the voices of marginalized communities and groups may not be heard, care was taken that separate PRAs were conducted with women and SC/ST households.

    The table gives an overview of the topmost priorities identified by our stakeholder communities from across all geographies. An aggregation such as this obviously flattens variations between regions and social groups. But it nevertheless is indicative of some of the foremost concerns troubling households in our core catchment areas.

    It is interesting to note that even though a large proportion of households in the core areas are from rural regions, only two of the top ten requirements relate to agriculture (highlighted in green). The balance eight reflect a strong desire to lead a better quality of life today (shown in brown) or aspirations for their children (indicated in blue). While people aspire for an improvement in the quality of life today, they are equally concerned that their children grow into a healthy, educated and skilled resource with the capabilities to compete in the employment markets of tomorrow. With respect to implications for ITC, it is worth noting that barring public infrastructure works, our projects currently cover 6 of the 10 needs listed above.

  • Risks and Opportunities: Sustainability Challenges

  • Materiality Analysis

  • Materiality Matrix

  • Disclosure on Material Aspects

100%